<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copyright in an employee&#8217;s work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etclaims.co.uk/2008/02/copyright-in-an-employees-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etclaims.co.uk/2008/02/copyright-in-an-employees-work/</link>
	<description>tactics &#38; precedents</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 10:48:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naomi</title>
		<link>http://etclaims.co.uk/2008/02/copyright-in-an-employees-work/comment-page-1/#comment-1473</link>
		<dc:creator>Naomi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etclaims.co.uk/?p=97#comment-1473</guid>
		<description>Sorry -  wishful thinking! I&#039;m afraid you&#039;re right. 

This is basically a matter of inertia. The employer will be reluctant to make a change without being sure it&#039;s ok. Being satisfied that a change is ok involves some mental effort, and probably also some consultation. You&#039;ll need to be quite important to your employer before you will be able to get them to engage with the problem at all. 

But once you realise how strong a force inertia is, you can put it to work for you. If there&#039;s something in the contract your employer sends you that object to, a tactic that has a better chance of succeeding is simply to  amend the bits you don&#039;t like in manuscript, sign it and send it back (keeping a copy). Lots of HR officers will just file and forget at this point - leaving it open to you to argue, if it ever comes to it, that your amended version is the version that was agreed. This won&#039;t solve disagreements about the day-to-day fundamentals of your contract  - salary, working hours, holiday etc  - but for the kind of content  that probably won&#039;t arise and is there &#039;just in case,&#039; it may well do the trick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry &#8211;  wishful thinking! I&#8217;m afraid you&#8217;re right. </p>
<p>This is basically a matter of inertia. The employer will be reluctant to make a change without being sure it&#8217;s ok. Being satisfied that a change is ok involves some mental effort, and probably also some consultation. You&#8217;ll need to be quite important to your employer before you will be able to get them to engage with the problem at all. </p>
<p>But once you realise how strong a force inertia is, you can put it to work for you. If there&#8217;s something in the contract your employer sends you that object to, a tactic that has a better chance of succeeding is simply to  amend the bits you don&#8217;t like in manuscript, sign it and send it back (keeping a copy). Lots of HR officers will just file and forget at this point &#8211; leaving it open to you to argue, if it ever comes to it, that your amended version is the version that was agreed. This won&#8217;t solve disagreements about the day-to-day fundamentals of your contract  &#8211; salary, working hours, holiday etc  &#8211; but for the kind of content  that probably won&#8217;t arise and is there &#8216;just in case,&#8217; it may well do the trick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://etclaims.co.uk/2008/02/copyright-in-an-employees-work/comment-page-1/#comment-1465</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etclaims.co.uk/?p=97#comment-1465</guid>
		<description>&quot;Once you point out what it means, most employers will have the grace to blush and withdraw it.&quot;  I&#039;m not so sure about that.  To get an employer to change the wording of a contract is a difficult task indeed.  The boss will not take the employee&#039;s opinion on what wording in a contract means.  Any proposed change will have to be sent to the lawyers for review.  Not many prospective employees have enough pull to get an employer to send a contract over to their lawyers to review proposed changes to the an employment contract.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Once you point out what it means, most employers will have the grace to blush and withdraw it.&#8221;  I&#8217;m not so sure about that.  To get an employer to change the wording of a contract is a difficult task indeed.  The boss will not take the employee&#8217;s opinion on what wording in a contract means.  Any proposed change will have to be sent to the lawyers for review.  Not many prospective employees have enough pull to get an employer to send a contract over to their lawyers to review proposed changes to the an employment contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

