<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Late amendments to the Employment Act 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etclaims.co.uk/2009/04/late-amendments-to-the-2008-regulations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etclaims.co.uk/2009/04/late-amendments-to-the-2008-regulations/</link>
	<description>tactics &#38; precedents</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 17:45:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Head</title>
		<link>http://etclaims.co.uk/2009/04/late-amendments-to-the-2008-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-1508</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etclaims.co.uk/?p=1471#comment-1508</guid>
		<description>I came across this a couple of days ago ... I still haven&#039;t stopped laughing, but at least I can now control myself sufficiently to type.  I have to mirror James Medhurst&#039;s comment - that I too have had cases where the client and their employee were psychically aware of the &#039;lament procedure&#039; before it had even been published.
  My salutations to Naomi and Michael for a masterful (?mistressful?) analysis .. in advance .. of the next &#039;simplification&#039; of statutory procedures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across this a couple of days ago &#8230; I still haven&#8217;t stopped laughing, but at least I can now control myself sufficiently to type.  I have to mirror James Medhurst&#8217;s comment &#8211; that I too have had cases where the client and their employee were psychically aware of the &#8216;lament procedure&#8217; before it had even been published.<br />
  My salutations to Naomi and Michael for a masterful (?mistressful?) analysis .. in advance .. of the next &#8216;simplification&#8217; of statutory procedures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Scutt</title>
		<link>http://etclaims.co.uk/2009/04/late-amendments-to-the-2008-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-1496</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Scutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etclaims.co.uk/?p=1471#comment-1496</guid>
		<description>Excellent post.  Bullet point 3 is particularly good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post.  Bullet point 3 is particularly good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leyton Rahman</title>
		<link>http://etclaims.co.uk/2009/04/late-amendments-to-the-2008-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-1434</link>
		<dc:creator>Leyton Rahman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etclaims.co.uk/?p=1471#comment-1434</guid>
		<description>A lawyer with a sense of humour!! Wonders will never cease!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lawyer with a sense of humour!! Wonders will never cease!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Medhurst</title>
		<link>http://etclaims.co.uk/2009/04/late-amendments-to-the-2008-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-1433</link>
		<dc:creator>James Medhurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 21:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etclaims.co.uk/?p=1471#comment-1433</guid>
		<description>What is worrying is that I have done a few cases in which this was complied with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is worrying is that I have done a few cases in which this was complied with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Ball</title>
		<link>http://etclaims.co.uk/2009/04/late-amendments-to-the-2008-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-1429</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etclaims.co.uk/?p=1471#comment-1429</guid>
		<description>Fabulous. Worthy of Douglas Adams and his circling poets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fabulous. Worthy of Douglas Adams and his circling poets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Hanning</title>
		<link>http://etclaims.co.uk/2009/04/late-amendments-to-the-2008-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-1428</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Hanning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etclaims.co.uk/?p=1471#comment-1428</guid>
		<description>Eminently sensible new rules as you rightly say save for the appalling discrimination as to representative laments. As the Institute of Legal Executives pointed out during the consultation process in the Dog &amp; Duck exactly a year ago today, ILEX Lawyers are just as competent to lament as Solicitors and Barristers and there can be no justification for the continued endorsement of outdated restrictive practices.

ILEX Lawyers wishing to join the protest should register their interest with the Federation of Overlooked Lawyers (FOOL) no later than noon this time next year.


[Nice work Naomi and Michael; the sad thing being it is almost believable]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eminently sensible new rules as you rightly say save for the appalling discrimination as to representative laments. As the Institute of Legal Executives pointed out during the consultation process in the Dog &amp; Duck exactly a year ago today, ILEX Lawyers are just as competent to lament as Solicitors and Barristers and there can be no justification for the continued endorsement of outdated restrictive practices.</p>
<p>ILEX Lawyers wishing to join the protest should register their interest with the Federation of Overlooked Lawyers (FOOL) no later than noon this time next year.</p>
<p>[Nice work Naomi and Michael; the sad thing being it is almost believable]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

