Skip to content

Employment Tribunal Claims

by Naomi Cunningham & Michael Reed

Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Getting advice
  • Resources
  • Reviews

Tag: writing

Posted onAugust 24, 2009advice

Legibility

by Michael1 Comment on Legibility

Quite a lot of material presented to tribunals is illegible. There are good reasons for this. Many documents produced out in the real world are…

Read More
Posted onJuly 31, 2009advice

Intensifiers, don’t

by Michael4 Comments on Intensifiers, don’t

Intensifiers are adverbs intended to strengthen adjectives. For example, writing ‘very unfair’ instead of ‘unfair’ should suggest that whatever you are referring to is more…

Read More
Posted onJuly 29, 2009advice

Pet phrases

by Michael3 Comments on Pet phrases

Most of us have words and phrases that we overuse. For example, I have a tendency to start sentences with ‘clearly’ when writing submissions: as…

Read More
Posted onMarch 27, 2009advice

Cutting

by MichaelLeave a comment on Cutting

One of points made by the last post is that legal writing should be short. The post itself is a good example of how much…

Read More
Posted onMarch 27, 2009advice

Avoid redundant writing

by MichaelLeave a comment on Avoid redundant writing

One common mistake in legal writing is excessive length. One of the causes of this is redundant phrasing. For example: We will provide a written…

Read More
Posted onMarch 19, 2009advice

Begging the question

by Michael4 Comments on Begging the question

You will often hear people in tribunal saying ‘That begs the question’. Almost all of them are misusing the phrase. ‘Begging the question’ is a…

Read More
Posted onMarch 18, 2009advice

Exclamation marks!

by MichaelLeave a comment on Exclamation marks!

Do not use them. You will look overexcited! Overeager! And quite possibly out of control! Seriously, exclamation marks are not generally appropriate in legal writing.…

Read More
Posted onMarch 13, 2009advice

Referring to numbers

by MichaelLeave a comment on Referring to numbers

It is often useful to number issues or similar topics. It provides structure and organisation. For example, in a written submission it is common to…

Read More
Posted onFebruary 19, 2009advice

Submission (Part 2)

by Michael2 Comments on Submission (Part 2)

A number of people have commented or emailed about “Do not submit” which recommended that advocates eliminate “I submit” from their vocabulary when addressing the…

Read More
Posted onFebruary 11, 2009advice

Do not submit

by Michael5 Comments on Do not submit

Many lawyers write and say things like: In my submission, the employer failed to follow a fair procedure This, I submit, was an act of…

Read More

Posts navigation

Previous Page Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 … Page 6 Next Page

Buy the book

Also on kindle .

Read a sample

Contents

Introduction

Chapter One

Subscribe by email

Tags

advocacy appeal book books bundle case management chronology compensation contract costs cross-examination Data Protection disclosure dispute resolution documents drafting EAT enforcement ET1 evidence fees grievance gross misconduct hearings interest issues legislation mitigation negotiation privilege procedure re-employment references remedies representation schedule of loss settlement statement submissions tax technology time limits unfair dismissal witnesses writing
Amphibious Theme by TemplatePocket ⋅ Powered by WordPress