Skip to content

Employment Tribunal Claims

by Naomi Cunningham & Michael Reed

Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Getting advice
  • Resources
  • Reviews

Category: advice

Posted onMarch 18, 2009advice

Speaking in exclamation marks!

by MichaelLeave a comment on Speaking in exclamation marks!

The last post advised against using exclamation marks in legal writing. A similar rule applies when speaking. If a transcript of what you say would…

Read More
Posted onMarch 18, 2009advice

Exclamation marks!

by MichaelLeave a comment on Exclamation marks!

Do not use them. You will look overexcited! Overeager! And quite possibly out of control! Seriously, exclamation marks are not generally appropriate in legal writing.…

Read More
Posted onMarch 17, 2009advice

Guest post: Peter Wallington QC

by GuestLeave a comment on Guest post: Peter Wallington QC

A few words on witness statements Tribunals nowadays always expect witnesses to have written statements. Sometimes these are very long, sometimes very short. There are…

Read More
Posted onMarch 16, 2009advice

There is no order but chronological order (II)

by NaomiLeave a comment on There is no order but chronological order (II)

Even if it seems like a good idea to arrange the papers in the bundle in some order other than strict chronological order, it isn’t.…

Read More
Posted onMarch 13, 2009advice

Slingsby v Griffith Smith Solicitors

by MichaelLeave a comment on Slingsby v Griffith Smith Solicitors

The EAT has concluded that the strict time-limits on starting an appeal apply equally to cross-appeals. This provides an excellent opportunity to reiterate that the…

Read More
Posted onMarch 13, 2009advice

Referring to numbers

by MichaelLeave a comment on Referring to numbers

It is often useful to number issues or similar topics. It provides structure and organisation. For example, in a written submission it is common to…

Read More
Posted onMarch 13, 2009advice

Polkey and contributory fault: liability or remedy?

by NaomiLeave a comment on Polkey and contributory fault: liability or remedy?

Unfair dismissal hearings are very often split between a ‘liability’ hearing, at which it is decided whether or not the claimant has been unfairly dismissed,…

Read More
Posted onMarch 12, 2009advice

Never assume a hearing has been cancelled

by MichaelLeave a comment on Never assume a hearing has been cancelled

Unless you have seen a written order from the tribunal; heard a Judge give an order or had a conversation with the tribunal staff in…

Read More
Posted onMarch 11, 2009advice

The more things change…

by MichaelLeave a comment on The more things change…

Mark Bennett, a Texan criminal defence attorney, practices a very different sort of law to us. In fact, we’re probably as far apart as it’s…

Read More
Posted onMarch 10, 2009advice

Guest post: Jennifer Eady QC

by Guest3 Comments on Guest post: Jennifer Eady QC

Try to retain your good humour. Litigation is stressful for most people and bad tempered advocates raise the stakes and make life more tiring for…

Read More

Posts navigation

Previous Page Page 1 … Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 … Page 45 Next Page

Buy the book

Also on kindle .

Read a sample

Contents

Introduction

Chapter One

Subscribe by email

Tags

advocacy appeal book books bundle case management chronology compensation contract costs cross-examination Data Protection disclosure dispute resolution documents drafting EAT enforcement ET1 evidence fees grievance gross misconduct hearings interest issues legislation mitigation negotiation privilege procedure re-employment references remedies representation schedule of loss settlement statement submissions tax technology time limits unfair dismissal witnesses writing
Amphibious Theme by TemplatePocket ⋅ Powered by WordPress