Skip to content

Employment Tribunal Claims

by Naomi Cunningham & Michael Reed

Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Getting advice
  • Resources
  • Reviews

Tag: submissions

Posted onJune 19, 2013advice

More good advice from a philosopher

by NaomiLeave a comment on More good advice from a philosopher

When you’re reading or skimming argumentative essays… here is a quick trick that may save you much time and effort, especially in this age of…

Read More
Posted onJune 13, 2013advice

Don’t make the reader clamber over a pile of scaffolding

by Naomi1 Comment on Don’t make the reader clamber over a pile of scaffolding

1.  In this skeleton argument, references to pages of the core bundle will be in square brackets, in bold print, with the prefix “core.” References…

Read More
Posted onMarch 21, 2012advice

Chronologies: Inside or outside?

by MichaelLeave a comment on Chronologies: Inside or outside?

A lot of people put chronologies inside other documents, most commonly written submissions. This is not a terrible sin, but it’s normally better to keep…

Read More
Posted onAugust 25, 2010advice

The dangers of reading the tribunal

by Michael1 Comment on The dangers of reading the tribunal

One of the things you do in a tribunal hearing is read how you’re coming over to the panel. Then you can adjust your approach…

Read More
Posted onApril 9, 2010advice

“Legal submissions shall be in writing…”

by NaomiLeave a comment on “Legal submissions shall be in writing…”

A standard instruction that turns up from time to time in case management orders goes: Legal submissions (if any) shall be in writing and accompanied…

Read More
Posted onFebruary 11, 2010advice

Dogs that don’t bark

by Michael1 Comment on Dogs that don’t bark

Inspector Gregory: “Is there any other point to which you would wish to draw my attention?” Holmes: “To the curious incident of the dog in…

Read More
Posted onMarch 13, 2009advice

Referring to numbers

by MichaelLeave a comment on Referring to numbers

It is often useful to number issues or similar topics. It provides structure and organisation. For example, in a written submission it is common to…

Read More
Posted onFebruary 19, 2009advice

Submission (Part 2)

by Michael2 Comments on Submission (Part 2)

A number of people have commented or emailed about “Do not submit” which recommended that advocates eliminate “I submit” from their vocabulary when addressing the…

Read More
Posted onFebruary 11, 2009advice

Do not submit

by Michael5 Comments on Do not submit

Many lawyers write and say things like: In my submission, the employer failed to follow a fair procedure This, I submit, was an act of…

Read More
Posted onJanuary 9, 2009advice

Tombstone Ltd v Raja & Heals

by Naomi & MichaelLeave a comment on Tombstone Ltd v Raja & Heals

The Court of Appeal has commented on the proper use of skeleton arguments in Tombstone Ltd v Raja & Heals. Although the case had nothing…

Read More

Posts navigation

Page 1 Page 2 … Page 4 Next Page

Buy the book

Also on kindle .

Read a sample

Contents

Introduction

Chapter One

Subscribe by email

Tags

advocacy appeal book books bundle case management chronology compensation contract costs cross-examination Data Protection disclosure dispute resolution documents drafting EAT enforcement ET1 evidence fees grievance gross misconduct hearings interest issues legislation mitigation negotiation privilege procedure re-employment references remedies representation schedule of loss settlement statement submissions tax technology time limits unfair dismissal witnesses writing
Amphibious Theme by TemplatePocket ⋅ Powered by WordPress